Really. I offered him to everyone several times. I got crickets or bent over offeres. I screwed the pooch and draft this year. I lost my QB I had via a deal when I got declined again in round 1. Give me a break. I need players. Hill will get suspended and I will be out more money with a team that sucks. Hell we dont even have a QB yet.
So cut me some slack. There are several deals that have been made that I hope were put into the same scrutiny.
Based on what I know, I see no reason why the trade should be voided. $6.0 mil in salary was traed for $6.0 mil in salary. I do not see this trade falling into one of the categories for voiding it (see below). But a member asked for a review and I have asked the committee to review it.
7.5 - Trade may be vetoed by the Trade Committee, if, in their judgment, the trade is not in the best interest of the KRFL. A two/thirds vote will determine the outcome of their review. 7.5a - Trade Committee Guidelines: 1) If the trade is unfair to one of the teams involved, it should be vetoed. 2) If the trade seriously impairs the future viability of a franchise, it should be vetoed. 3) If the trade is detrimental to the league in any other manner, it should be vetoed.
No offence meant or suggestion it wasn't above board but it does appear seriously imbalanced. Black Hills already has possibility of 3 picks in $2M round before trade. Given that half the teams passed the last round there isn't likely to be much action, giving those picks less value. By my calculations, if Black Hills were to use all 5 picks in $2M, could only make 2 picks in $1M round. Tyreek Hill's in-season trade value would be far higher. That said, I'm good with whatever is decided. Just thought it warranted a second look. No disrespect to anyone involved.